Spreaker | Apple Podcasts | Google Play | Stitcher
Tom “Attorney Dad” Frizzell joins Heather for a legal breakdown of Dzhokhar “Jahar” Tsarnaev’s December 2019 appeal hearing. We discuss the most potent of the appellate team’s legal arguments, including the Patriarca rule, the failure of Judge O’Toole to ask potential jurors content-based questions about their exposure to pretrial publicity, and the two seated jurors who lied during voir dire. No ruling has been made yet, but we also talk about potential steps forward, whether or not the First Circuit judges rule in Jahar’s favor.
Read Heather and Eric’s summary of the appeal hearingEpisode music: “The Complex” by Kevin MacLeod
http://www.incompetech.com
1 thought on “Appealcast #3 – Jahar’s Appeal Hearing”
Very good to hear the Prosecution’s position, and the zingers from the judges. News articles that have a comment section show there’s still plenty of hatred toward Jahar. He deserves a fair trial with a fair judge. O’Toole was a disgrace. Thank you.
US v. Tsarnaev 
Very good to hear the Prosecution’s position, and the zingers from the judges. News articles that have a comment section show there’s still plenty of hatred toward Jahar. He deserves a fair trial with a fair judge. O’Toole was a disgrace. Thank you.